These are just a few examples of language that applicants can insert into a settlement agreement in order to protect themselves in the event that a defendant fails to make the payments required by the agreement: whereas the parties wish to keep in mind the terms of their agreement and do so in this document; and, ultimately, the terms that an applicant may negotiate in a settlement agreement vary depending on the strength of the claims, the circumstances of the case by case, and the desire of the parties to resolve the dispute. However, an applicant who does not include safeguards in the event of delay may face serious problems if the defendant does not comply with the terms of the agreement, in particular in situations where the applicant waives rights or rights in excess of the settlement amount to settle the remedy. Suppose, for example, that a plaintiff makes claims against a defendant for $300,000 and agrees to settle the case for $150,000 $US. As part of the transaction, the applicant undertakes to close the appeal with prejudice. The phrase “prejudiced” means that the plaintiff agrees that he/she can never again assert the same rights against the same defendants, and the closure of biased proceedings is a usual provision in settlement agreements aimed at settling claims in full and definitively. This form is a settlement agreement and authorization that can be used in a district court proceeding. It contains design notices and optional clauses Instead of or in addition to lump sum damages, claimants may attempt to include a provision that charges the claimant all attorneys` fees incurred in an action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement in the event of delay by the defendant, in addition to all sums still due under the transaction agreement. For protection against delay, claimants may also include a lump-sum damages provision that requires the defendant to pay a fine in excess of the agreed amount to settle the case in the event of the defendant`s delay. . .